Indian IP
Delhi High Court Affirms Validity of Antenna Patent and Finds Infringement
In a suit by Commscope Technologies LLC against Rosenberger, the Delhi High Court upheld the split sector antenna patent and found infringement. The Court rejected invalidity challenges and affirmed unauthorised use of the patented invention.
Delhi High Court Remands Harvard Stem Cell Patent Application for Fresh Review
In President and Fellows of Harvard College v. Controller of Patents, the Delhi High Court set aside refusal of a patent application concerning stem-cell derived beta cells. The matter was remanded for reconsideration in accordance with statutory requirements under the Patents Act.
Delhi High Court Enforces Settlement Terms in ‘SUPERON’ Mark Dispute
In Superon Schweisstechnik India Ltd. v. Mehra Brothers, the Delhi High Court found breach of a settlement agreement governing the “SUPERON” trademark. Continued use contrary to agreed terms was restrained as actionable violation.
Delhi High Court Lifts ‘KALASH’ Injunction Post Insolvency Transfer
In proceedings involving K.S. Oils and its asset purchasers, the Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte injunction over the “KALASH” mark, holding that post-insolvency change in ownership altered the rights landscape.
Delhi High Court Directs Takedown to Protect Lawrence School Trademark
In The Lawrence School, Sanawar Society v. John Doe & Ors., the Delhi High Court granted interim protection of its registered trademark and directed Meta Platforms Inc. to remove infringing content hosted on Facebook.
Madras High Court Finds ‘SUGAR POP’ Deceptively Similar to Registered Mark
In a suit by Sugar Cosmetics against the user of “SUGAR POP,” the Madras High Court ordered removal of the impugned mark, holding likelihood of confusion with the plaintiff’s registered trademark.
Bombay High Court Denies Relief in Minco Dispute Due to Prolonged Acquiescence
In Minco India Ltd. v. Minco Electronics Pvt. Ltd., the Bombay High Court refused interim injunction, holding that longstanding acquiescence defeated the claim for equitable relief.
Delhi High Court Awards Damages for Unauthorised Use of Songs in Film
In proceedings involving the banner of Rakshit Shetty, the Delhi High Court held infringement established in relation to unauthorised use of songs in “Bachelor Party” and awarded ₹25 lakh towards damages.
Punjab & Haryana High Court Seised of Dispute Over Copyright Strikes on News Content
A journalist has approached the Punjab and Haryana High Court against the Aam Aadmi Party, challenging copyright strikes issued on his Facebook page for use of photographs of the Chief Minister. The plea raises questions on ownership of official images, fair use, and platform-driven enforcement.
Plagiarism Row Escalates as Legal Notice Issued in ‘Dhurandhar 2’ Dispute
A legal dispute has emerged between filmmaker Aditya Dhar and Santosh Kumar RS concerning alleged plagiarism of the film “Dhurandhar 2: The Revenge.” Santosh Kumar claims the storyline is derived from his 2023 script “D-Saheb,” while Dhar has issued a legal notice refuting the allegations as false and untenable, with both sides indicating recourse to legal proceedings.
Delhi High Court Grants Protection to ‘Pookie Baba’ Against Digital Exploitation
In Aniruddhacharya Ji Maharaj v. John Doe & Ors., the Delhi High Court restrained unauthorised use of the persona of Aniruddhacharya Ji Maharaj. The Court found prima facie infringement through misleading online content and directed takedown of infringing material.
Price Reduction Strategy Adopted for Ozempic and Wegovy in Indian Market
Novo Nordisk has reduced prices of “Ozempic” and “Wegovy” in India amid generic competition, reflecting commercial responses to patent lifecycle pressures.
Global IP
US International Trade Commission Initiates Investigation Into Streaming Device Patents
Before the United States International Trade Commission, a complaint has triggered investigation into Roku and Hisense concerning alleged infringement of streaming display patents, with potential for exclusion orders on infringing imports.
US Court Reopens Patent Findings in Athletic Footwear Technology Dispute
In Lululemon Athletica Canada Inc. v. Nike, Inc., before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Lululemon secured reversal of findings on infringement and validity concerning shoe technology patents against Nike.
US District Court Seised of Competing Machinery Patent Claims
In Caterpillar Inc. v. Bobcat Company, pending before the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Caterpillar has filed counterclaims alleging infringement of machinery patents by Bobcat.
OECD Updates Global Patent Dataset Using Latest EPO PATSTAT Release
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development has revised its patent datasets based on the Autumn 2025 edition of the European Patent Office’s PATSTAT database, refining global patent analytics and innovation mapping.
UAE Trademark Office Relaxes Timelines for Submission of Certified Documents
Pursuant to Administrative Decision No. 2 of 2026 issued by the UAE Ministry of Economy, the UAE Trade Marks Office has introduced temporary extensions for filing certified documents in trademark applications, permitting delayed compliance without additional official fees.
Trademark Dispute Over ‘Life of a Showgirl’ Moves Before US Federal Court
In proceedings before the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Taylor Swift faces a trademark infringement action concerning “Life of a Showgirl,” raising issues of ownership, priority, and likelihood of confusion.
US Court Declines Preliminary Injunction in ‘March Madness’ Branding Dispute
In National Collegiate Athletic Association v. DraftKings Inc., before the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, the Court refused interim relief against DraftKings, finding insufficient grounds to restrain use of “March Madness” at the preliminary stage.
US Court Rejects Substantial Similarity Claims in Literary Infringement Suit
In Freeman v. Deebs-Elkenaney et al., before the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, the Court granted summary judgment against plaintiff Lynne Freeman, holding that alleged similarities with Tracy Deebs-Elkenaney’s “Crave” series were confined to unprotectable elements and did not establish infringement.
Claims Against Streaming Series Fail Before California Federal Court
In litigation by Pepperdine University against Netflix and Warner Bros., the United States District Court for the Central District of California dismissed claims concerning the “Running Point” series, holding that the pleadings did not disclose a sustainable cause of action.
Washington State Moves to Near-Total Ban on Non-Compete Agreements
On March 23, 2026, Bob Ferguson signed House Bill 1155 into law, effectively prohibiting nearly all non-competition agreements for Washington-based employees and independent contractors. The legislation, effective 30th June 2027, places Washington alongside jurisdictions such as California and Minnesota in restricting enforceability of non-compete covenants.
Texas Federal Court Dismisses $50 Million Copyright Suit Over ‘Enough (Miami)’
In Joshua Fraustro and Miguel Aguilar v. Cardi B et al., before the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the Court dismissed a $50 million copyright infringement suit concerning the song “Enough (Miami).” The plaintiffs alleged copying of their work “Greasy Frybread.” The Court held that the claims were procedurally deficient, including lack of proper copyright registration at the time of filing and jurisdictional shortcomings, dismissing the action without prejudice.
